The solder pads (red arrow) are where the cable connection typically breaks. Proper adjustment of the cable strain relief (blue arrow) should prevent future cable disconnection.
After completing a few more projects, the replacement EC234 heating element arrived.
Fortunately, I had a newer BA60 barrel nut in my parts bin because the original barrel nut didn't fit. The WTCPS is back in service, albeit, as a backup to the Hakko FX-888D soldering station.π
Back to the Ortofon...
As warm as Ike Quebec's tenor sax is a fitting description of how this MC step-up transformer sounds. If I'm deciphering it right, it's also echoed in the translation of the Stereo Sound article pictured above.
This MC step-up device is definitely NOT for audiophiles who analyze the minutest resolution of detail in the soundstage!
However, for those who love music, the Ortofon STM-72 complements the classic SPU or an ultra low output moving coil cartridge like the Fidelity Research FR1 MkII. It may even be the antidote to harsh sounding low Z/low output MC cartridges. That's IF, it can be acquired in the $150 price range. Beyond that, go for an Altec 4722 (or maybe the Cinemag equivalent?), which offers two levels of gain (1:18 + 1:36), wider bandwidth + better overall sound, IMHO!
Those are some TINY little transformers! I suspect the high asking prices for these little SUTs is a function of brand cachet and the "vintage & vinyl revival"...
ReplyDeleteNice job reviving the soldering iron! No more cold solder joints! ;-)
Thanks!
DeleteI think the vintage/vinyl crowd is best served by Redboy MC step up transformers - https://www.flickr.com/photos/152614846@N06/albums/page1/ -ππ»π
Hi Joseph
ReplyDeleteYou didn't consider replacing the captive IC with its cheap RCAs for something superior? It doesn't have to cost more than the SUT itself. Currently I'm having the time of my life with some ol' school "tweed" covered yellow/ black dotted "Studer/Sommer" ready made ICs.
They fit right ind with their lovely warm tone yet transparent and natural top end.
I'm seeking one of these STM-72s out and thought of replacing this with std.item.
Cheers from DK
I just prefer to hear the STM-72 in its original form first, then take it from there. Right now, I listen to my FM-MCT1, TKS83 and 4722 more than the STM-72.
DeleteThanks Joseph!
ReplyDeleteThat you found it worth toying with the STM-72 and mentioning it here, was the last gentle push I needed, having had my scepticisems about its provessππ
Mine arrived today and was duely connected right away replacing an A23 SPU SUT running.the #1S (aswell being previously heard through my ANJ S-7Cz)
The STM-72 is rather interesting prioritizing everything quite differently.
The soundstage, width especially, shrunk immediately, with a lot less emphasis on reverb besides the anticipated reduction in "detailing" and recording artifacts.
In exchange I got a nice weighty n' meaty center image and organic tonality with very natural voices w/o any trace of thin hardness, having enough of what matters the most - if wanting to return to what got me into this hobby; the love of music, w/o being sidetracked by all manner "irrelevant" studio gimmicks.
Besides - most surprisingly given the size of this wee thingey - it having this big generous weighty warm organic bottom end.
So a very welcome addition to my other SUTs.
But to appreciate the STM-72, I guess you'll have to've been around the audio block enough times, to have grown tired of the ever increasing brightness of today. Often causing a pale thinness without enough flesh and blood. Well:
Here's your antidote
P.S.
I might give it a go later with replacing the stock IC for something better. It being the kind we discarded aeons ago.
Best regards
rappaport