Before taking the preamp out of the system for a thorough check up on the test bench, I searched for a couple of tube shields from my parts bin.
Voila! The unusual hum and noise vanished.π
Before taking the preamp out of the system for a thorough check up on the test bench, I searched for a couple of tube shields from my parts bin.
Voila! The unusual hum and noise vanished.π
Bach Chaconne from Partita No. 2 in D minor for Solo Violin |
An important lesson I learned as a classically trained violinist was that music theory evolved from the analysis and study of great masterpieces from Bach to Bartok. Great composers broke theory to reach new heights in musical expression. Just like any artistic pursuit, music continues to evolve through individuals who are not afraid to go against convention for a greater good!
Tube load line simulator from Trioda.com |
On the other hand, audio engineering, for the most part, has always been theory driven. Audio design simulators are significant modern conveniences but don't guarantee musical-sounding circuits even if the metrics look great. Creativity in audio design is when human ears are still the final arbiter, at least in my experience and opinion, which is why my hifi system is a hodgepodge of mostly obsolete technology, some of which date back to almost a century ago.
Last year, a Juilliard-trained pianist turned lawyer visited my man cave and listened to various amps + a couple of speakers I built. On his second visit, he brought his amps for comparison. At the end of that session, he commissioned a pair of Altec 753C speakers, the second pair I built in collaboration with John Piro of Hommage Audio, who crafted the speaker cabinets.
The chosen amp was the Radiotron SE2A3 - a topology from the pre-WWII Radio Designer's Handbook, 3rd edition. This circuit was from an era in which calculators were but a dream and engineers computed complex equations aided by a slide rule.
Although this pentode-driven circuit sounded fine as is, to my ears, its fullest potential was only realized after I adjusted the plate and screen grid voltages to achieve a 2:1 ratio as suggested by my Ukrainian internet buddy, Sergey Didkovsky in the winter of 2007.
"Try please, to increase the cathode resistor (1,2k-1,5k ohm) and reduce anode resistor (to75k-82k). It will allow to increase Ua up to 150V and to receive Ua:Ug2 = 2:1 ratio. The sound should become more 'interesting and old.' That is especially good for jazz. Still mine 5 cents...use good NOS oil capacitors in G2. I use TCC Visconol. I think oil caps in the grid - adds bass. Reduction of the anode resistor - improves the hi range a little."
Click here for the 2007 Radiotron SE2A3 article |
I'm pretty sure the 2:1 ratio wasn't a number crunched by a simulator, it was a figure painstakingly chosen by Sergey's ears because of his love for music!
Sergey, wherever you are, I pray that you and your family are safe. Freedom-loving people around the world are very grateful, yet very sorry that Ukraine is all alone in shielding the free world from the atrocities of a megalomaniacal autocrat!
Tube rolling is a fun aspect of the audio hobby. It only gets tedious when audiophiles start splitting hairs about a VT231, 5692, etc. I draw the line when an audiophool claims, "...my line stage preamp resolves the R train rumble under Carnegie Hall better when I use a 6AS7 in place of the original 6SN7..." π
Those two tubes may be pin compatible BUT a power transformer π₯melt-downπ₯is imminent since the 6AS7/6080 draws 2.5 amps @ 6.3V. That's over 4 times more filament current drawn by a 6SN7, which only draws 0.6 amps @ 6.3V.
π£ π£ π£ Rolling tubes is dangerous unless you have a working knowledge of electronics to comprehend tube data/specs. π£ π£ π£
It's been a while since I listened through Telefunken 12AX7 smooth plates on an RCA phono. Since I used to graft this circuit on a Dyna PAS preamp, I ordered a pair of 12AU7/12AX7 > 6SN7/6SL7 adapters to relive the experience on my RCA octal preamp.
Back in the 90s, Steve @ Angela Instruments had a boatload of Raytheon 5755s and shared a sleeve with me. Since I never found a project requiring these tubes, I got a pair of 5755/WE420 > 12AX7 adapters to listen to them in the Shure M65 clone. Piggy-backed to 12AX7>6SL7 adapters, they also worked nicely with the octal phono preamp.
Despite slight differences in transconductance and plate impedance between the 6SL7/7F7 and their younger 9-pin siblings (ECC83, 12AD7, 5751 and 5755), there was no visible variation in square waves nor frequency response aberration when I bench tested those tubes in both circuits.
Admittedly, loctals don't look as glamorous as their octal cousins with bakelite bases. But I'm very fond of them to the extent that I built and use a full function loctal preamp. I've been adopting unloved loctals at radio shows and hamfests. Essentially the industrial looking 7F7 and 7N7 are rebased 6SL7 and 6SN7, respectively! My only issue with loctals is, the tube pins are prone to corrosion. This is easily remedied by a wire brush + DeoxIT before use.
I purchased these tube adapters from the seller xulingmrs. They are very well made and fairly priced. Shipping cost and transit time from China was also reasonable. Highly recommended!
Joe Roberts' piece, "I Never Met a 2A3 Amp That I Didn't Like," from Sound Practices Issue 15, is very persuasive. I built jc morrison’s micro 2A3 amp soon after I received the issue via snail mail fresh from the printers in the mid '90s. After rereading the article in ‘07, I got inspired to make a Radiotron SE2A3 variant.
jc morrison's micro |
Since my Altec 755As in open baffles required more power, or so I thought then, the power and output transformers were expropriated for the classic JE Labs SE300B project.
Fi "X" by Don Garber from a Sound Practices ad |
In 2017, I had wanted to build a 6SF5>2A3 amplifier tribute to the Fi "X" in memory of Don Garber π’ but a busy schedule got in the way.
During the March 2020 lockdown, I was motivated to review my audio DIY to-do list which led to a long-overdue parts bin inventory. I turned up a 700 VCT @ 150 mA power transformer pulled from a junked Scott 99D mono integrated. This iron is not a stranger since I've used a pair in my PP2A3 mono-blocks in the olden days. I dug up a couple of 6C8G grid capped/octal based twin triodes as well.
6SL7 vs. 6C8G
transconductance (gm)= 1600 umhos (both)
gain (mu) = 70 vs. 38
plate resistance (Rp) = 22,500 vs. 44,000
max. plate current (each plate) = 2.3mA vs. 3.2mA
Despite the equal transconductance, the 6C8G isn't a drop-in equivalent of the 6SL7. Aside from the different pinout, the mu and Rp are lower. When the triode sections are paralleled, the Rp is closer to a medium mu/gm triode like a 76.
morrison micro, reimagined |
This 2-stage direct coupled circuit is a reimagined morrison micro using a 6C8G front end. The paralleled triode sections draw about 3.4 mA and the 510 ohm cathode bias resistor is bypassed with a 100uf @ 16V cap to maximize input sensitivity.
Each 2A3 is AC heated by a Hammond 166M2 (2.5V @ 3A) filament transformer. The operating points are well within the modest specs of the Scott 99D power transformer.
The fullest potential of an amplifier circuit can't be realized if it's inhibited by a mediocre output transformer.
Hashimoto H203S |
James 6123HS |
Nature Sound NS70SE |
Tamura F7002 Permalloy |
Tango/Hirata NY15S |
Budget Output Transformers Noguchi PMF-10WS, Edcor GXSE15-16-3.5K, Noguchi PMF-15WS |
Noguchi (now G-trans.co.jp) Finemet |
Kasuga KA6625ST Square Waves L > R: 100Hz, 1kHz, 10kHz |
4.34V rms squared/8 ohms = 2.35W |
Ever since I grafted a 6SN7 on the line stage section of my hacked Dyna PAS preamp, I've been hooked on the "octal sound." Could it be the higher heater current draw boiling more electrons and/or larger stature that give it a 3-D quality, richer tonal color, detail, dynamics + more, compared to their 9-pin/noval siblings?
Ideally, the 3850 ohm plate resistance of the two triode sections of a 6SN7 connected in parallel should drive a 12K primary Z. I considered getting a pair of Hammond 125BSE output transformers, which have the flexibility of reflecting back a 2.5K, 5K or 10K primary Z but I already had a pair of these 5.5K:4 ohm SE OPTs in my parts bin that I was sure would fit under the chassis.
The circuit is a simple 2-stage cascade - 1 triode section of a 6CG7 functions as the input/driver stage R-C coupled to paralleled 6SN7 triode sections.
Square waves at 100Hz, 1 kHz and 10 kHz Top trace = audio generator Bottom trace = amplifier output |
1kHz square wave from Stereophile Test CD3 Stock Magnavox CDB560 CD player |
Fortunately, I got a chance to sample a genuine single crown S1 graciously donated by Gary B. This select chip made my DAC sound a bit more transparent and cleaner, with a touch more detail and resolution. But I have to reaffirm that not having an S1 isn't a deal breaker. In fact, the darker and warmer sounding regular TDA1541s and TDA1541As can be a blessing in systems that are a bit hot in the top end.
1 kHz square wave from Stereophile Test CD3 nosTDA1541tube DAC |
Not very relevant to this NOS DAC project, but AFAIK, the only difference between TDA1541A and the non-A is that the A can do 8x oversampling while the non-A is limited to 4x. But let's not go there anymore. Been there, done that...
Before I even became aware of NOS DACs, I had been using line transformers as digital sound processors. If you're worried about non-oversampled digital artifacts destroying the irreplaceable diaphragms of your Altec 3000 super tweeters, look for bandwidth limited military surplus transformers.
Many thanks to Gary Bronner and Pete Boser for their contributions to the JE Labs digital audio museum, as well as to the patrons of this blog!